![]() It has introduced things like "Secure DNS" which is built on DNS-over-HTTPS (DOH). ![]() It's brought about massive adoption across all major browsers. Their renewed interest has dramatically affected a dormant ecosystem. From the introduction of new encryption protocols like DNS-over-HTTPS (DOH), to the renewed focus on integrations. The browser's support of encryption has brought about a massive change in the industry. This, however, is changing and it's being facilitated by its biggest sponsor - browsers. There are several reasons for this, but for me, I'd attribute it to two simple barriers to entry - too technical and poor integration. While DNSCrypt has been around for a decade, adoption has been relatively low. But what happens in a world where the users are not the same? What happens in a world where a user is 5 years old? What happens in a world where a parent explicitly decides what should, and should not, be allowed on their home network? It's about ensuring the users' privacy, their security.Īt face value, we too agree with the basic premise that has driven the current strategy. So at its core, encrypted DNS, similar to encrypted HTTP (i.e, HTTPS) is about ensuring that no-one can see what we're up to on the network. Those insights could then be sold to organizations, and in some instances used by governments to silence dissidents. With DNS it was about combating the overreach of Internet Service Providers (ISP) and Governments.Īt a micro level, seeing I requested "" probably isn't horrible, but when you look at it from a macro level that would imply an organization can ascertain online behavior, interests, and in some instances intent. The driving force for encryption has always been security and privacy. Encryption makes readable things unreadable to anyone that might be snooping on the network. ![]() This is a gross oversimplification of the process, but the point is the same. For instance, the same "" request on the network might look like this "Y2xlYW5icaSDfasdm93c2luZy5vcmc=" to someone monitoring the network. It doesn't affect how you make the request but does change how the content of the request is transferred from one location to another. So if your computer requests "" then someone on the network could see that a request was made, but more importantly what was in the request - i.e., .Įncryption serves to make something that is readable, not readable. As the name implies, it is clear which implies it can be seen. While some of the changes can be applauded, many of the deployments are proving to be problematic to parents, schools, and other organizations looking to create family-friendly environments for kids.īy design, DNS has traditionally been sent in what is known as "clear-text". What is changing is how it's being deployed and made available. Encrypted DNS itself is not new, it's been around for a decade.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |